The Medieval History Journal

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karashima, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Medieval History Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1, 35-42 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/097194580100400103

The Family of Mallappa Nayaka: Transferability of vijayanagar Nayakas in Tamil Nadu

Noburu Karashima

Taisho University, Tokyo, Japan

During the period of the Vijayanagar empire, mainly in the sixteenth century,1 many nayakas were sent by the kings to Tamil Nadu from Karnataka or Andhra Pradesh as military leaders as well as administrators. Though it is vaguely understood by scholars that they were transferred from one place to another by the kings, so far no proof has been presented to substantiate this understanding.2 This transferability of nayakas is a crucial point for understanding the role these nayakas played in the state rule, and therefore, the Vijayanagar state structure. According to Burton Stein, who put forward the so-called 'segmentary state theory', nayakas in Tamil Nadu, except such big ones as the Senji, Thanjavur and Madurai nayakas, were local powers, like the zamindars of the Mughal period, having their power base in the locality where they were supported by communal relations.3 To Stein, therefore, the idea of the transfer of nayakas must have been quite unpleasant, being antagonistic to his own idea. Though I have discussed this point to a certain extent elsewhere,4 the following examination is an effort to resolve this crucial issue.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?